Delight Springs

Thursday, February 29, 2024

"immediate delight... fruits for life"

Leave "the liver" (but not the delighted liver) out of it

"...Scientific theories are organically conditioned just as much as religious emotions are; and if we only knew the facts intimately enough, we should doubtless see "the liver" determining the dicta of the sturdy atheist as decisively as it does those of the Methodist under conviction anxious about his soul. When it alters in one way the blood that percolates it, we get the methodist, when in another way, we get the atheist form of mind. So of all our raptures and our drynesses, our longings and pantings, our questions and beliefs. They are equally organically founded, be they religious or of non-religious content.

To plead the organic causation of a religious state of mind, then, in refutation of its claim to possess superior spiritual value, is quite illogical and arbitrary, unless one has already worked out in advance some psycho-physical theory connecting spiritual values in general with determinate sorts of physiological change. Otherwise none of our thoughts and feelings, not even our scientific doctrines, not even our DIS-beliefs, could retain any value as revelations of the truth, for every one of them without exception flows from the state of its possessor's body at the time.

It is needless to say that medical materialism draws in point of fact no such sweeping skeptical conclusion. It is sure, just as every simple man is sure, that some states of mind are inwardly superior to others, and reveal to us more truth, and in this it simply makes use of an ordinary spiritual judgment. It has no physiological theory of the production of these its favorite states, by which it may accredit them; and its attempt to discredit the states which it dislikes, by vaguely associating them with nerves and liver, and connecting them with names connoting bodily affliction, is altogether illogical and inconsistent.

Let us play fair in this whole matter, and be quite candid with ourselves and with the facts. When we think certain states of mind superior to others, is it ever because of what we know concerning their organic antecedents? No! it is always for two entirely different reasons. It is either because we take an immediate delight in them; or else it is because we believe them to bring us good consequential fruits for life..."

WJ, Varieties

But doesn’t just say “no it isn’t”…

(See Monty Python's Argument Clinic)

"The good student contradicts his teacher and makes him more eager to explain and defend the truth."
— Baltasar Gracián, The Art of Worldly Wisdom

https://www.threads.net/@philosophybits/post/C36pHl7r3iG/

Wednesday, February 28, 2024

Cheer up & think

Two ways philosophy can help. Worth essaying, as Montaigne would say. Give it a try.

Michel de Montaigne wrote, "The most certain sign of wisdom is cheerfulness."

Linus Pauling said, "The best way to have a good idea is to have a lot of ideas." WA

 


Tuesday, February 27, 2024

Letters From Spring: A travelogue from baseball’s past and present - The Athletic

"It was raining in New York — a miserable afternoon in mid-March. Perfect. Grabbed my coat and got my hat, left my worries on the doorstep. Flew to Miami, drove to Fort Lauderdale, saw the banks of lights gleaming in the gloaming, found the ballpark, parked, climbed to the press box, said hello, picked up stats and a scorecard, took the last empty seat, filled out my card (Mets vs. Yankees), rose for the anthem, regarded the emerald field below (the spotless base paths, the encircling palms, the waiting multitudes, the heroes capless and at attention), and took a peek at my watch: four hours and forty minutes to springtime, door to door."

— Roger Angell

I was eight years old when Angell wrote those words during spring training, 1975. I wouldn't first read them until many years later, but when I did read them I was eight years old again. I always am, every year when reading Angell's classic essay, "Sunny Side of the Street." I always thought it could have been called "How long until Springtime, door to door?"
...
Joe Posnanski

http://theathletic.com/2394789/2021/02/18/letters-from-spring-a-travelogue-from-baseballs-past-and-present/

“Why is philosophy important to you?”

Good answer, Massimo. It does help us wade meaningfully and strive more forcefully. Or it can.

"Philosophy, as you know, literally means love of wisdom. To embrace philosophy means to adopt a way of thinking about everything that attempts to wade through the bullshit and to live a meaningful life based on reason and compassion. Since the philosophical stance applies to everything, it is hard for me to imagine something more important.

Even, or perhaps especially, when it comes to personal relationships—with my daughter, my wife, my siblings, my friends, and so forth—it is because of my understanding of philosophy that I keep trying to be a better human being, or the best version of it that I am capable of."

— Massimo Pigliucci
https://open.substack.com/pub/celineleboeuf/p/why-philosophy-massimo-pigliucci?selection=12e95e24-eb44-4879-8068-c8f8d101069d&r=35ogp&utm_medium=ios

Monday, February 26, 2024

"The sun on your arms or whatever"

I spent a lot of my weekend watching Spring Training on the MLB network.

Here’s part of what draws me back to baseball in the desert every March. 

“...As a sentient being who happens to be a passionate sports fan, I have had ample opportunity to grapple with this question. Why do we bother? We will most likely never meet the athletes we root for. We will never make as much money as they do. Nothing they do affects our physical health, our families or our livelihoods. Yet our emotional well-being rises and falls with their success on the field, on the court and on the baseball diamond.
I believe it’s because, in a world in which tribalism is pulling us apart, the completely imaginary tribalism of the sports fan is a necessary balm. Not because it allows you to celebrate — though you do occasionally get to do that — but because you get to lose. A lot. Nothing brings us together like communal suffering. And this simulated losing helps prepare us for the worst that life can dish out.”
As the late great commissioner said, “it breaks your heart”… and then it strengthens your resilience. It builds the muscles of care, confidence, and perseverance. It's great fun in the sun. And it happens every Spring.

Bill Bradley played a different game (and politics too) but I think he understands the feeling: "If you can have an openness and joy about life that allows you to experience other people, nature, feeling the sun on your arms or whatever every day, you are gonna have a full life, whatever you do." 

Saturday, February 24, 2024

The Rigor of Angels: Borges, Heisenberg, Kant, and the Ultimate Nature of Reality by William Egginton

What an ambitious, impressive attempt to bring together the worlds of serious literature, Kantian philosophy, and quantum physics. I'm uncertain (like Heisenberg!) it succeeds but it's wonderfully, entertainingly provocative.

Understanding the world as a "reciprocal reflection of perspectives" is pretty Jamesian, too.

From the postscript:

"Quantum theory is the victory of science over the presuppositions that make science possible. That its findings still register such shock manifests how deeply those presuppositions take root. The physicist Carlo Rovelli puts it this way as he outlines what he calls the relational interpretation of quantum mechanics: "If we imagine the totality of things, we are imagining being outside the universe, looking at it from out there. But there is no 'outside' to the totality of things…. [W] hat exists are only internal perspectives on the world which are partial and reflect one another. The world is this reciprocal reflection of perspectives."[ 1] Indeed, the alternative interpretations of quantum mechanics I have discussed here—from objective collapse to many worlds—are, in his words again, "efforts to squeeze the discoveries of quantum physics into the canons of metaphysical prejudice."[ 2] Those canons of metaphysical prejudice work in mysterious ways. Even as they guide how scientists think about the meaning of their most significant discoveries, they also affect the lives those scientists lead, how they judge their lives, how we all judge our lives."


In short, despite our dearest desires and most desperate dreams, we are finite. That we can only ever understand things in relation to one another means that understanding will always stem from a limited perspective. Our reason propels us to incredible heights—understanding the fundamental components of matter and laws of the universe, seeing almost to the edges of the cosmos and the beginning of time. But it also leads us woefully astray. For the very ability we have to map our world and hence see our way through the dark also treats that map as though it were the world, and hence drapes a new veil over our enlightened eyes.

"Metaphysical prejudice": the perfect term to describe that magical thinking that Borges, Heisenberg, and Kant each explored, engaged with, and ultimately undid. Quantum theory may not gird us against metaphysical prejudice, but we cannot fully grasp its meaning while maintaining that prejudice. And thus, the persistence of its apparent paradoxes serves as a powerful reminder of how deeply set, how necessary to our thinking those prejudices are. When we see an effect, we reach for a cause, out there, in a world that is ubiquitous in space and durable in time, because we know, just know, that is how the world must be. We know so, but we are wrong. There is rigor there, indeed. But to see that we are the chess masters who made it, we must let the angels go. And that, it seems, is the hardest task of all.

— The Rigor of Angels: Borges, Heisenberg, Kant, and the Ultimate Nature of Reality by William Egginton
https://a.co/eN3tq95

Help yourself

"…The most profound achievements of moral and political philosophy lie not in abstract theory or geometric proof but in finding words by which to light our way to lives well-lived. If that is not self-help, what is?"
—Kieran Setiya

Is Philosophy Self-Help? | The Point Magazine

https://thepointmag.com/examined-life/is-philosophy-self-help/

W.E.B. Du Bois

Paternal wisdom from WJ's student-

"Be honest, frank and fearless and get some grasp of the real values of life… Read some good, heavy, serious books just for discipline: Take yourself in hand and master yourself."

On W.E.B. Du Bois's birthday, his lovely letter of advice to his daughter.

https://www.themarginalian.org/2016/02/23/w-e-b-du-bois-yolande-letter/

https://www.threads.net/@mariapopova/post/C3st5cSxv8o/

Friday, February 23, 2024

Lifelong companions

We have much to learn from our most loyal sidekicks, our forever pals.


http://dlvr.it/T38lTX

Freedom of the spirit

Yesterday in CoPhi, some denied that greater freedom for all to pursue happiness (in the spirit of J.S. Mill) would improve society.

Mr. Shirer, and anyone who's ever lived under the thumb of dictatorship, would disagree. I hope this generation of students never has to learn that the hard way.

It's time to vote.
"Living in a totalitarian land taught me to value highly—and fiercely—the very things the dictators denied: tolerance, respect for others and, above all, the freedom of the human spirit."
William L. Shirer, born on this day in 1904
It's the birthday of William L. Shirer, born in Chicago, Illinois (1903). After graduating from college, he expected to spend two months in Europe. He stayed for more than twenty years, and became one of America's most outstanding war correspondents. He spent much of his early career in Vienna, Berlin, and Prague, reporting on the Nazis' rise to power. Back in the United States after the war, Shirer was blacklisted during the McCarthy era. This gave him time to write one of the most famous chronicles of World War Two, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (1959), which won the National Book Award. WA

Lifelong companions

It's no illusion from their perspective, they're all in. If only humans would learn to "live fully in the moment" that way with one another!

I've now enjoyed the delight of living, and paid the painful price of parting, with a dozen or so lifelong canine companions, going all the way back to Queenie and the little red wagon. Great models of companionable commitment all. And they're all still with me.


"You know the pain is coming, you're going to lose a dog, and there's going to be great anguish, so you live fully in the moment with her, never fail to share her joy or delight in her innocence, because you can't support the illusion that a dog can be your lifelong companion. There's such beauty in the hard honesty of that, in accepting and giving love while always aware that it comes with an unbearable price." ~Dean Koontz, The Darkest Evening of the Year

Thursday, February 22, 2024

No disembodied philosophers

It's the birthday of an old sourpuss who didn't believe in happiness or the ultimate value of life. But paradoxically perhaps, he is nonetheless a great pleasure to read.

"Schopenhauer believed that we live in a world of continual strife and that the "will," our inner nature, inevitably leads to pain and suffering unless we are able to renounce desire and assume an attitude of resignation. He was a great influence on the literature of Thomas Mann, the music of Richard Wagner, and the psychology of Sigmund Freud." WA

And he was a peripatetic who loved dogs. He walked with a series of poodles he called Atman.


Rousseau, who's on our agenda in CoPhi today, was another peripatetic some thought pathetic. Like Schopenhauer, he was a complex and  damaged personality probably better appreciated from the distance of decades or centuries rather than up close and personal. Our Socrates Express chapter on him is entertaining (and owes something, I suspect, to Gymnasiums of the Mind). I hope it inspires a few of us to go outside, as lately-- in this mild (and yesterday marvelous, at 70 degrees) mid-TN February-- I've been doing after every morning class before lunch. One of these days soon we'll all get out there during class. "Doing and not-doing" is well worth doing.
"When we walk, we are simultaneously doing and not-doing. On one level, our minds are engaged: focusing on the terrain ahead, cognizant of the periphery. Yet none of this thinking occupies much cerebral space. There's plenty left over for meandering, and freak following.

No wonder so many philosophers walked. Socrates, of course, liked nothing more than strolling in the agora. Nietzsche regularly embarked on spirited two-hour jaunts in the Swiss Alps, convinced "all truly great thoughts are conceived by walking." Thomas Hobbes had a walking stick custom made with a portable inkwell attached so he could record his thoughts as he ambled. Thoreau regularly took four-hour treks across the Concord countryside, his capacious pockets overflowing with nuts, seeds, flowers, Indian arrowheads, and other treasures. Immanuel Kant, naturally, maintained a highly regimented walking routine. Every day, he'd eat lunch at 12: 45 p.m., then depart for a one-hour constitutional—never more, never less—on the same boulevard in Königsberg, Prussia (now Russia). So unwavering was Kant's routine that the people of Königsberg set their watches by his perambulations.

Good walkers, all of them. None, though, compares with Rousseau. He'd regularly walk twenty miles in a single day. He once walked three hundred miles from Geneva to Paris. It took him two weeks.

For Rousseau, walking was like breathing. "I can scarcely think when I remain still; my body must be in motion to make my mind active." As he walked, he'd jot down thoughts, large and small, on playing cards that he always carried with him. Rousseau was not the first philosopher to walk but he was the first to philosophize so extensively about walking.

The walking philosopher gives the lie to one of the discipline's greatest myths: that it is a mental pursuit wholly divorced from the body. From Archimedes's eureka moment in the bath to Descartes's masterful fencing to Sartre's sexual escapades, philosophy has a swift corporeal current running through it. There are no disembodied philosophers, or philosophies. "There is more wisdom in your body than in all of your philosophy," said Nietzsche."

Nietzsche, another bumptious and somewhat deranged peripatetic whose personality, we can only imagine, would have been so much harder to stand had he remained seated.


Wednesday, February 21, 2024

The Jamesian shrink

On a search for the cure, inspired by Marcus Aurelius, William James, Walker Percy, Eleanor Roosevelt, and Lou Marinoff. And my dogs.


http://dlvr.it/T33fpF

The Jamesian shrink

LISTEN. We teachers these days can't avoid noticing how many of our young students are self-diagnosing as anxious, displaced from a consistent core identity, and pessimistic about their prospects in life.

Young adulthood has always been a challenging time of life, but things seem different now. It's become commonplace to identify the Internet and social media as the locus of difference driving young angst. I guess that'll do, in the absence of more directly-life-threatening sources of distress (like, say, a Russian invasion or a war of extermination). 

Jonathan Haidt has a book coming soon, The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood Is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness.

I'm scheduled to deliver an MTSU Honors lecture later this semester in their series Mental Health and the Good Life: Strategies for Happiness, Wholeness, Wellbeing. I'm personally and philosophically motivated to understand and do what I can to address this issue.

I've been discussing it with a friend, who proposes a form of therapeutic intervention involving film studies and the Shakespearian premise from As You Like It (which we'll be taking up later this semester in Susan Neiman's Why Grow Up) that "all the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players..."

It's an intriguing proposal. Call it cine-behavioral therapy. Reminds me of Walker Percy’s Binx Bolling in The Moviegoer, a young man on a mission he calls The Search. “The search is what anyone would undertake if he were not sunk in the everydayness of his own life. To become aware of the search is to be onto something. Not to be onto something is to be in despair.”

Maybe we should register for Socratic shrink Lou Marinoff’s counseling seminar and get ourselves certified. Hang out a shingle. It might be self-therapeutic, if not more broadly ameliorative (or remunerative).

I do wonder, though, if it’s ultimately constructive to encourage a young person who’s already feeling disaffected and detached to take a step further into the gallery and view herself as merely a player on a stage, a character in her own drama.

Walker Percy again: in Love in the Ruins: The Adventures of a Bad Catholic at a Time Near the End of the World he wrote about a troubled biologist with an identity crisis and a condition his lapsed Catholic “counselor” calls angelism (“excessive abstraction of the self from itself”). Deploying a tool he calls a “Qualitative Quantitative Ontological Lapsometer,” the doc prescribes a cure involving a long slog home through the swamp–in other words, a deeper immersion in the real world of physical exertion and resistance. The goal: “recovery of the self through ordeal.”

"He registered a dizzy 7.6 mmv over Brodmann 32, the area of abstractive activity. Since that time I have learned that a reading over 6 generally means that a person has so abstracted himself from himself and from the world around him, seeing things as theories and himself as a shadow, that he cannot, so to speak, reenter the lovely ordinary world. Instead he orbits the earth and himself. Such a person, and there are millions, is destined to haunt the human condition like the Flying Dutchman."
It could be that unhappy young people these days are feeling more ethereal and out of touch with reality because, well, they’re out of touch with reality. Too much in touch with electrons and virtual misrepresentations of reality. Too cut-off from from the “lovely ordinary world.” Orbital. In desperate need of William James’s “remedy” in On a Certain Blindness in Human Beings, right after the passage in which he applauds Emerson’s unbidden “exhilaration” at merely being alive and “crossing a bare common”:

Life is always worth living, if one have such responsive sensibilities.

But we of the highly educated classes (so called) have most of us got

far, far away from Nature. We are trained to seek the choice, the rare,

the exquisite exclusively, and to overlook the common. We are stuffed

with abstract conceptions, and glib with verbalities and verbosities;

and in the culture of these higher functions the peculiar sources of joy

connected with our simpler functions often dry up, and we grow

stone-blind and insensible to life's more elementary and general goods

and joys.


The remedy under such conditions is to descend to a more profound and

primitive level…


So yes, there must be a version of the examined life that doesn’t descend into egocentric self-absorption and self-pity. A version that recovers what’s best in the experience of being a live human subject with goals and dreams. Ideally too, a version that doesn’t require therapeutic intervention involving serious risk of bodily harm.

When I hang out my shingle I’ll be framing my Marcus Aurelius morning mantra. It may not take, with many brooding anxiety-ridden youngsters, but they need to hear it:

“When you arise in the morning, think of what a precious privilege it is to be alive-to breathe, to think, to enjoy, to love.”
And: push away from the screen. Get out into the open air. Walk the dog. Go for a hike. Socialize with your friends in real time, in real places. Get over yourself. Heed Eleanor Roosevelt: “You wouldn’t worry so much about what others think of you if you realized how seldom they do.”

I may not be cut out for counseling after all.  Solvitur ambulando may not be everyone’s cure. But isn’t it worth a try?

Monday, February 19, 2024

Misplaced rigor

I'm enjoying "The Rigor of Angels" but disagree that Diogenes' retort was unsuccessful. Some philosophical challenges, especially those rooted in excessive intellectualism like Zeno's paradoxes of motion, are best sidestepped and not "dealt with head-on"... Misplaced rigor makes for stiffened inflexibility, ultimately for intellectual rigor mortis.

"Zeno proved hard to refute. Aristotle thought he was refuting the paradoxes even as he transcribed them. But generations of philosophers have agreed that his response—while certainly preferable to that of Diogenes the Cynic, whose retort was to stand up and walk—never really dealt with the challenge head-on."

"The Rigor of Angels: Borges, Heisenberg, Kant, and the Ultimate Nature of Reality" by William Egginton: https://a.co/ihAzwN5

Stellar

Emerson was right about the days being (natural) gods, the best ones anyway.


http://dlvr.it/T2y7wg

Stellar days

 What a fine weekend!

On Saturday we finally went to see our old friend Lorenzo Washington at his small but impactful Jefferson Street Sound Museum. We knew him long before he was a "national treasure," I recall him telling me about the museum back when it was still just a gleam in his eye. He's still got the gleam.

 

Saturday night they took me out to celebrate my birthday at our new favorite Indian place, Hyderabad, near the Parthenon. The staff serenaded me in the most frenetic electro-pop version of Happy Birthday I've ever enjoyed (it has no rivals).

When we got home, Younger Daughter gifted me excessively (including one of those coveted Stanley mugs) and unveiled the best chocolate cake ever. It really has no rivals. Nor has she. No exaggeration. And I'm hanging onto the candles so I can turn 'em around, the next nine years will be memorable.

 

 

Sunday afternoon it warmed enough to make almost-ideal conditions for a dogwalk in Warner Park.


It's important to notch these good days on the stick of memory. They're gods, as Emerson said. They'll carry us through the lesser ones. They'll help keep things in the right perspective.


A president to celebrate

History will be kind to JEC.

https://www.threads.net/@thecartercenter/post/C3fpStFAdsv/

Saturday, February 17, 2024

LXVII

That's my number. Before it was my age it was a special year.


http://dlvr.it/T2tbb3

On calling Bullshit

I entirely agree with Kieran Setiya the academic and professional philosophical world needs more charity and generosity.

But the world at large, and particularly the political world, is increasingly steeped in the stuff that needs calling out.

What's a philosopher to do?

Maybe spend a little more time attending to the larger world, and a little less to peers?

A little, at least?

It is fun, though, calling out one's peers and predecessors. "Hegelisms" deserve some derision, for instance, though Hegelianism has its place too. [Michael Prowse, My new friend Hegel]

But philosophers will face only one another and not the larger public make themselves irrelevant, and sometimes ridiculous too.

Check out the podcast clip in Kieran's post this morning:
"…the relevant sort of bullshit isn't Harry Frankfurt's, i.e. speech that is indifferent to the truth, but Gerry Cohen's or Gordon Pennycook's, i.e. speech that can't be clarified because it is nonsense masked as meaningful assertion…

We are not nearly charitable enough—and with sufficient generosity, we can make good sense of texts we first found unintelligible, or vacuous, or utterly confused… I'm increasingly uncomfortable calling bullshit." -Kieran Setiya

 


Friday, February 16, 2024

A 💘 for meliorists

Natural Selection/"Romance in the Climate Crisis"

…All of us deserve to be ringed by concentric circles of care, but when those systems never exist, or do not aid us—the weather gone rogue, international treaties failing us, politicians disappointing us, social systems frayed—we are forced to lean on those closer in. We require more from our loved ones when we get less from everyone, and everything, else…  


To clock what is gone is to clock all we can still save. A world where we are mad, but we're working out of love. Building better systems of care. Fighting for a place where the dragonflies can shimmer in the light. It's one of the reasons I think we need to keep telling—and living—love stories, even as the forests burn. Because falling in love can mean falling into a new way of being…  


Climate change isn't conceptual; it's affecting us now. The philosophers of our time know this. A friend recently sent me a photo of a new Tinder ad in her subway station: Two people hold hands while facing a towering monster of trash. The copy at the bottom reads: "Someone to save the planet with."


—Erica Berry
https://orionmagazine.org/article/natural-selection-relationships-dating-climate-change/

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

Where Will Virtual Reality Take Us?

"And so another urgent question is whether people can enjoy the storied reality of finitude after coming down from the high of fake infinity. Can being merely human suffice? Can the everyday miracle of the real world be appreciated enough?" —Jaron Lanier

https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/where-will-virtual-reality-take-us

Saturday, February 10, 2024

Baruch Spinoza and the Art of Thinking in Dangerous Times

A fresh look at Spinoza:

…the "Caute" on his ring referred to "the caution that the philosopher needs in his intercourse with non-philosophers." If, as Buruma warns, we are entering an era in which "freedom of thought is under threat from secular theologies," Spinoza may be the role model we need: a thinker who spoke the most outrageous truths he knew, and still managed to die in his bed.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/02/12/baruch-spinoza-and-the-art-of-thinking-in-dangerous-times

Too much “reality”?

Stephen Fry gives the Apple Vision Pro a try, and an entertaining review. But is this a clear vision of real reality? Will Eliot's epigraph be all too apt?

https://open.substack.com/pub/stephenfry/p/a-vision-of-the-future?r=35ogp&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post

Stoicism and Emotion

https://open.substack.com/pub/figsinwinter/p/free-e-book-stoicism-and-emotion?r=35ogp&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post

Not the perspective shift we‘re looking for

Generative AI's Large Language Models (LLMs) "are another vast inhuman engine of information processing that takes our human knowledge and interactions and presents them back to us in what Lovecraft would call a "cosmic" form..."

Kieran Setiya

https://open.substack.com/pub/ksetiya/p/readers-digest-february-10-2024?r=35ogp&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post

Friday, February 9, 2024

Parents Are Highly Involved in Their Adult Children’s Lives, and Fine With It

We all need and benefit from mutual support, of all kinds.
"New surveys show that today’s intensive parenting has benefits, not just risks, and most young adults seem happy with it, too.

...When baby boomers were growing up, there was a belief, rooted in the American ideal of self-sufficiency, that children should be independent after age 18, not relying on their parents. But that was in some ways an aberration, social scientists said. Before then, and again now, it has been common for members of different generations to be more interdependent.

Parents’ involvement in young adults’ lives began to grow in the 1970s. The transition to adulthood became longer, and less clear-cut: It was no longer necessarily the case that at 18 children left home for college, marriage or jobs. Parenting gradually became more intensive, as people had fewer children and invested more in their upbringings.

In recent years, that has also meant providing children with more emotional support, research shows: “They may be the first generation of adults who have parents who actually grew up with the mind-set of talking about this kind of stuff'..." nyt

Thursday, February 8, 2024

This is us (on the cosmic calendar)

I don't want this story (ours or Harvey's) to end. But of course, time will march on – with or without us. Eventually without, no doubt. As Russell says, we must in the meantime turn our attention to other things.

"…In the closing second of the cosmic year there's industrialisation, fascism, the combustion engine, Augusto Pinochet, Nikola Tesla, Frida Kahlo, Malala Yousafzai, Alexander Hamilton, Viv Richards, Lucky Luciano, Ada Lovelace, crowdfunding, the split atom, Pluto, surrealism, plastic, Einstein, FloJo, Sitting Bull, Beatrix Potter, Indira Gandhi, Niels Bohr, Calamity Jane, Bob Dylan, Random Access Memory, soccer, pebble-dash, unfriending, the Russo-Japanese War, Coco Chanel, antibiotics, the Burj Khalifa, Billie Holiday, Golda Meir, Igor Stravinsky, pizza, Thermos flasks, the Cuban Missile Crisis, thirty summer Olympics and twenty-four winter, Katsushika Hokusai, Bashar Assad, Lady Gaga, Erik Satie, Muhammad Ali, the deep state, the world wars, flying, cyberspace, steel, transistors, Kosovo, teabags, W. B. Yeats, dark matter, jeans, the stock exchange, the Arab Spring, Virginia Woolf, Alberto Giacometti, Usain Bolt, Johnny Cash, birth control, frozen food, the sprung mattress, the Higgs boson, the moving image, chess. Except of course the universe doesn't end at the stroke of midnight. Time moves on…"

— Orbital by Samantha Harvey
https://a.co/5Rz69NL



Tuesday, February 6, 2024

Cosmic perspective

The mood-boost from rising and circling above it all is apparently easy to get from low earth orbit, and then lose.

The view from the space station:
"…Before long, for all of them, a desire takes hold. It's the desire–no, the need (fuelled by fervour)–to protect this huge yet tiny earth. This thing of such miraculous and bizarre loveliness. This thing that is, given the poor choice of alternatives, so unmistakably home. An unbounded place, a suspended jewel so shockingly bright. Can humans not find peace with one another? With the earth? It's not a fond wish but a fretful demand. Can we not stop tyrannising and destroying and ran-sacking and squandering this one thing on which our lives depend? Yet they hear the news and they've lived their lives and their hope does not make them naive. So what do they do? What action to take? And what use are words? They're humans with a godly view and that's the blessing and also the curse.

It seems easier on balance not to read the news. Some do and some don't, but it's easier not to. When they look at the planet it's hard to see a place for or trace of the small and babbling pantomime of politics on the newsfeed, and it's as though that pantomime is an insult to the august stage on which it all happens, an assault on its gentleness, or else too insignificant to be bothered with. They might listen to the news and feel instantly tired or impatient. The stories a litany of accusation, angst, anger, slander, scandal that speaks a language both too simple and too complex, a kind of talking in tongues, when compared to the single clear, ringing note that seems to emit from the hanging planet they now see each morning when they open their eyes. The earth shrugs it off with its every rotation. If they listen to the radio at all it's often for music or else something with an innocence or ultimate neutrality about it, comedy or sport, something with a sense of play, of things mattering and then not mattering, of coming and going and leaving no mark. And then even those they listen to less and less.

But then one day something shifts. One day they look at the earth and they see the truth. If only politics really were a pantomime. If politics were just a farcical, inane, at times insane entertainment provided by characters who for the most part have got where they are, not by being in any way revolutionary or percipient or wise in their views, but by being louder, bigger, more ostentatious, more unscrupulously wanting of the play of power than those around them, if that were the beginning and end of the story it would not be so bad. Instead, they come to see that it's not a pantomime, or it's not just that. It's a force so great that it has shaped every single thing on the surface of the earth that they had thought, from here, so human-proof.

Every swirling neon or red algal bloom in the polluted, warming, overfished Atlantic is crafted in large part by the hand of politics and human choices. Every retreating or retreated or disintegrating glacier, every granite shoulder of every mountain laid newly bare by snow that has never before melted, every scorched and blazing forest or bush, every shrinking ice sheet, every burning oil spill, the discolouration of a Mexican reservoir which signals the invasion of water hyacinths feeding on untreated sewage, a distorted flood-bulged river in Sudan or Pakistan or Bangladesh or North Dakota, or the prolonged pinking of evaporated lakes, or the Gran Chaco's brown seepage of cattle ranch where once was rainforest, the expanding green-blue geometries of evaporation ponds where lithium is mined from the brine, or Tunisian salt flats in cloisonné pink, or the altered contour of a coastline where sea is reclaimed metre by painstaking metre and turned into land to house more and more people, or the altered contour of a coastline where land is reclaimed metre by metre by a sea that doesn't care that there are more and more people in need of land, or a vanishing mangrove forest in Mumbai, or the hundreds of acres of greenhouses which make the entire southern tip of Spain reflective in the sun. 

The hand of politics is so visible from their vantage point that they don't know how they could have missed it at first. It's utterly manifest in every detail of the view, just as the sculpting force of gravity has made a sphere of the planet and pushed and pulled the tides which shape the coasts, so has politics sculpted and shaped and left evidence of itself everywhere. 

They come to see the politics of want. The politics of growing and getting, a billion extrapolations of the urge for more, that's what they begin to see when they look down. They don't even need to look down since they, too, are part of those extrapolations, they more than anyone–on their rocket whose boosters at lift-off burn the fuel of a million cars. 

The planet is shaped by the sheer amazing force of human want, which has changed everything, the forests, the poles, the reservoirs, the glaciers, the rivers, the seas, the mountains, the coastlines, the skies, a planet contoured and landscaped by want."

Orbital by Samantha Harvey

 



Monday, February 5, 2024

a cosmic and mysterious thing

"To stand on another body of rock that isn’t the earth; is it necessarily the case that the further you get from something the more perspective you have on it? It’s probably a childish thought, but he has an idea that if you could get far enough away from the earth you’d be able finally to understand it – to see it with your own eyes as an object, a small blue dot, a cosmic and mysterious thing. Not to understand its mystery, but to understand that it is mysterious. To see it as a mathematical swarm. To see the solidity fall away from it."

Orbital by Samantha Harvey

 





Sunday, February 4, 2024

Please notice

https://www.threads.net/@lacancircle/post/C27JosyL-ll/

Time and the soul

(As we discussed last semester in Happiness)-

…This attrition of presence, he observes, is maiming not only our individual inner lives but the inner life of humanity as we have come to mistake the right away of immediacy for the now of presence. Two millennia after Seneca devised his cautionary taxonomy of time saved, spent, and wasted, we have invented innumerable tools and technologies to save time but find ourselves wasting it more helplessly than ever. We can only save ourselves, Needleman intimates, by recalibrating our relationship to time, which is fundamentally our relationship to the self and to the meaning of human life. He writes:

The real significance of our problem with time… is a crisis of meaning… The root of our modern problem with time is neither technological, sociological, economic nor psychological. It is metaphysical. It is a question of the meaning of human life itself.

At the center of our self-defeating challenge is an unexamined premise: We have framed time as a problem — the problem of how to structure and manage our lives — when it is best regarded as a question...

https://mailchi.mp/themarginalian/time-clouds-despair

Saturday, February 3, 2024

How to grow old: "be like a river"

Lord Russell on going with the flow of the great river of life


http://dlvr.it/T2G7BL

Gertrude and WJ

And legend has it: he gave her an A when she turned in a blank exam and said she just didn't feel like taking it that day.

"It's the birthday of the avant-garde novelist and poet Gertrude Stein, born in Allegheny, Pennsylvania (1874). She was one of the early students at Radcliffe College, the sister school to Harvard University, and her favorite professor was the psychologist William James. He taught her that language often tricks us into thinking in particular ways and along particular lines. As a way of breaking free of language, he suggested she try something called automatic writing: a method of writing down as quickly as she could whatever came into her head. She loved it, and used it as one of her writing methods for the rest of her life."

https://open.substack.com/pub/thewritersalmanac/p/the-writers-almanac-from-saturday-942?r=35ogp&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post

How to Grow Old - Bertrand Russell

Solid wisdom from Bertie, except for:  “I never do anything whatever on the ground that it is good for health, though in actual fact the things I like doing are mostly wholesome.”

He must have had lots of luck... and strong genetics.

But the rest of this little essay is marvelous. It concludes:

"…make your interests gradually wider and more impersonal, until bit by bit the walls of the ego recede, and your life becomes increasingly merged in the universal life. An individual human existence should be like a river: small at first, narrowly contained within its banks, and rushing passionately past rocks and over waterfalls. Gradually the river grows wider, the banks recede, the waters flow more quietly, and in the end, without any visible break, they become merged in the sea, and painlessly lose their individual being. The man who, in old age, can see his life in this way, will not suffer from the fear of death, since the things he cares for will continue. And if, with the decay of vitality, weariness increases, the thought of rest will not be unwelcome. I should wish to die while still at work, knowing that others will carry on what I can no longer do and content in the thought that what was possible has been done."

https://www.organism.earth/library/document/how-to-grow-old

Friday, February 2, 2024

Don’t make it deeper

Yes, Slavoj, but a good philosopher will also try to help you climb out of it. Maybe you need to watch Groundhog Day again. Don't be misanthropic Phil Connors, stuck in Punxsutawney. Have a little sympathy and humanity.

"I despise the kind of book which tells you how to live, how to make yourself happy. Philosophers have no good news for you at this level. I believe the first duty of philosophy is making you understand what deep shit you are in!" Slavoj Zizek

https://substack.com/@slavojzizek/note/c-48603863?r=35ogp&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action

The search goes on

"It has been said that man is a rational animal. All my life I have been searching for evidence which could support this."
Bertrand Russell, who died on this day in 1970

https://www.threads.net/@reboomer/post/C22BnHQL_t0/

Me too.

Thursday, February 1, 2024

“Too much scepticism makes life impossible”… it seems

We're scheduled to discuss Pyrrhonian skepticism today in CoPhi, and we're meeting in the library. Really. It doesn't just seem so.

(Pyrrho seems to me a lot like Douglas Adams's "ruler of the universe"--"I say what it occurs to me to say when I hear people say things. More I cannot say..."…)
"All sorts of philosophers from Aristotle to David Hume ["a wise man proportions his belief to the evidence"] have argued that too much scepticism makes life impossible. In 1748 Hume wrote that a Pyrrhonian
. . . must acknowledge, if he will acknowledge anything, that all human life must perish, were his principles universally and steadily to prevail. All discourse, all action would immediately cease; and men remain in total lethargy, till the necessities of nature, unsatisfied, put an end to their miserable existence
Hume thought that a consistent Pyrrhonian Sceptic would not eat, drink or keep himself out of danger, because he would be incapable of deciding how to do any of these things. Should he put bread in his mouth or should he nibble a stone? Ordinary people believe that it is bread which is nourishing, but a Sceptic is surely committed to keeping an open mind [you know what they say about minds that are too open...] about it. Should he step aside from a thundering horse, or under its hooves? A Sceptic would have to suspend judgement on all such matters and suffer the consequences. One ancient author made a similar point by asking: 'how is it that someone who suspends judgement does not rush away to a mountain instead of to the bath, or stands up and walks to the door rather than the wall when he wants to go out to the market-place?'

Arcesilaus and other like-minded philosophers had an answer to this. A bath does seem to be the sort of place where you could get a good wash, and this explains why a Sceptic will head towards one when he wants to get clean. If a mountain seemed to be such a place, then he would go there instead; but it does not, so he goes to the bath. A door does seem to be the best way out of a house, bread does seem to be nourishing, and being trampled by horses does not seem to be a good idea. According to Arcesilaus, even though a Sceptic will refuse to form an opinion about how things really are, he can still freely admit that they appear one way rather than another. As Timon once said: 'That honey is sweet I do not affirm, but I agree that it appears so.'
[Timon appears to me too timid.]

Being human, a Sceptic is affected by appearances just like everyone else and so he will behave much like everyone else, at least in the essentials of life. He follows instincts, observes customs and generally acts in a sensible way, but he does so by habit or as a matter of human nature, not because he endorses any opinions about the world. As Sextus later put it, a Sceptic follows 'laws and customs and natural feelings' but lives 'without holding opinions'. [He's a conformist, then, paradoxically.] Thus if you were to ask him whether he definitely believes that bread is nourishing, a Sceptic would indeed say no, because he suspends judgement on the matter. But you will still find him in the larder." --Dream of Reason: A History of Western Philosophy from the Greeks to the Renaissance by Anthony Gottlieb