Now it's time to get on with our own "creative tension," in the classroom. Must keep moving forward. Must take our first daily quiz...
But we're still getting to know one another, so we can also take time to catch up on our respective weekends. One of the highlights of mine was a trip to the furniture department, whence I tweeted: "I may have found my perfect comfy chair. Already has my name on it." Literally.
Another was "Her." Any thoughts on that, anybody? From a bioethical, atheist/humanist, or any other perspective? It reminded me of #JaronLanier, "You Are Not A Gadget" & #DouglasAdams, "Real People Personality" androids. #Singularity too near?
Did you see Neil deGrasse Tyson on Bill Moyers? "God has to mean more to you than just where science has yet to tread...If the only reason you say "dark matter is God" is because it's a mystery, then get ready to have that undone."
And, I'm excited about the release of Richard Powers' new novel Orfeo. Almost think we should read that in Bioethics, instead of Generosity. Or in addition. Some have great music in their DNA, some have it thrust upon them. Powers can help us pick up the tune of genomic enhancements we don't yet know how to hear.
But that will be then, this is now. We begin with Alastair Campbell's Bioethics: The Basics.
"What is Bioethics?" It's the rapidly-changing interdisciplinary activity of posing questions like:
Is health care just a business like any other, or should health care professionals have a higher standard of ethics? Should we invent a pill that enables people to live for hundreds of years? Have parents the right to use science to design the kind of babies they want? Does everybody have an equal right to health care, whatever it costs? Is abortion the same as killing babies? Should we create creatures that are partly animal and partly human? Is it OK to sell our body parts, such as one of our kidneys, like we buy and sell our material possessions, our cars or our mobile phones? Should the state force people to adopt healthy life styles? Should mercy killing be made legal? Does it matter if our current use of natural resources is likely to totally destroy the environment in a few years from now?
Are we just consumers of information and medication, entitled to enhance ourselves and degrade nature as we please? Are we bringers of light, extenders of life? Or are we the early wave of a tide that will make "the atlas go dark"? Tough, complicated questions, for a young discipline whose name literally just means "ethics of life."
It's good to bear the simplicity of that name in mind, as we tackle those tough questions. Old oaths and newer codes can help keep us honest: 'The health of my patient must be my first consideration.'
The infamous Tuskegee Syphilis Study was anything but honest.
Nor is it honest or ethical to over-medicalize our lives, as Ivan Ilich warned in Medical Nemesis. "Medical materialism," William James called that.
Nor is it honest or ethical to over-medicalize our lives, as Ivan Ilich warned in Medical Nemesis. "Medical materialism," William James called that.
Bioethics isn't just about doctor-patient relationships anymore, nor does it automatically defer to the former's presumptive expertise. The health care covenant is too consequential to contractualize.
And speaking of covenants, Atheism and Philosophy...
In his Good Book, Anthony Grayling is not out to compel our belief. His appeal is to reason, critical reflection, and human nature as sufficient sources of goodness, wisdom, and meaning. Sapere aude, he (like Kant) might say. Dare to know, use your reason, have the courage to think. In the fleeting interval between birth and death, our lucky little escape from nothingness, the possibilities for enjoyment and insight are riper than we realize. Our greatest possibility is to grow, learn, evolve. Science can help in the endeavor.
And so can the instruction of the Book of Wisdom, chapter 16, verse 7: "exercise your body, whether you choose it or not, at a stated hour, in heat and cold..."
After all (16/16): "Do you think that you can act the fool, and be a philosopher?"
And so can the instruction of the Book of Wisdom, chapter 16, verse 7: "exercise your body, whether you choose it or not, at a stated hour, in heat and cold..."
After all (16/16): "Do you think that you can act the fool, and be a philosopher?"
No comments:
Post a Comment