Delight Springs

Tuesday, July 14, 2020

Endless forms



"The notion that a majority must have its way, whether in matters of opinion or in matters of personal conduct, is as pestilent and anti-democratic a notion as can possibly be conceived," said Columbia's president in a commencement address calling out the Tennessee General Assembly and Governor for validating an ill-informed majority of Tennesseans who rejected evolutionary science and the modernist movement in theology that sought to accommodate it. Nearly a century later it's hard to see our state legislature as any more astute or less benighted. Mother Jones magazine just a few years ago declared the Tennessee legislature the nation's worst (amidst fierce competition). And the Nashville Tennessean reported in May of this year that
On the final day of the legislative session, the 111th Tennessee General Assembly devolved into chaos Thursday after repeated disagreements between the House and Senate, a physical altercation with a member and a Democratic walkout.
I look forward, btw, to teaching a spring MALA course called Democracy in America, in many ways a natural sequel to this one.

Some other highlights in this week's reading:

Kirkland Hall | Aerial images of Vanderbilt Campus and Kirkl… | FlickrFamed horticulturist Luther Burbank thought the Scopes trial might actually provide the service of "educating the public and reducing the number of bigots" in America. (Vanderbilt's President Kirkland, memorialized in that tower atop the main administration building on the VU campus--which if you've not visited lately you should really check out, with its new over-the-top residential halls and a renovation of Greek row a friend who knows calls lipstick on a Greek pig) also thought it would stimulate serious study of Darwin.)

Needless to say, in 2020, the public still teems with ignorance and bigotry. Public courtroom spectacles don't seem to have been much of an instrument for learning, over the years, though this one--thanks to Edward Larson and Matthew Chapman--is serving us well in that regard. But it's a serious question, how we go about raising the bar of enlightenment in America. I used to think the Internet might help. Is it too soon to despair of that?

Scopes's "army," one reporter said, included "feminists, birth control advocates, agnostics, atheists, free thinkers, free lovers, socialists, communists, syndicalists, biologists, psychoanalysts, educators, preachers, lawyers, professional liberals, and... just talkers." Some of my best friends are canvassed in that impressive list, that in 1925 was meant to scare the bejeebers out of newspaper readers. Especially the talkers, although (as I've said many times before, in previous talks echoing William James and Richard Ford) it really would be an awful universe if everything came down to talk.


Permit me a digression, I've had Richard Ford much on my mind lately. Every July 4 I pull his book Independence Day off the shelf and reacquaint myself with its wit and wisdom. I tweeted about it just this morning:
That's kind of a declaration of independence from old houses. I wonder if any of you have lived in yours as long as I have mine, or if you've ever had to wrestle with an opportunity to move on before you were quite ready (that is, before your heart was quite ready though your head was quite clear as to the rightness of a move)?

But, back to business:

I really like the biting statement from Charles Francis Potter, the Unitarian "New York infidel" who said: "If the Anti-Evolutionists in Tennessee were aware of the existence of any other religions than. their own, they might realize that it is the very genius of religion itself to evolve from primary forms to higher forms." The best religion evolves. The best everything evolves. Or it gets left behind, as "endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved." That of course is how Darwin concluded his book.
There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.
They still don't have much use for Unitarians in Tennessee. I have a story about that, if anyone wants to hear it...

William James died in 1910, so he wasn't around to enjoy the spectacle of Scopes. But he would have been fascinated and repelled by the intransigence and intolerance on display in Dayton. His work The Varieties of Religious Experience respects the role of faith in anchoring human beings to their lives and projects, but also respects the role of science in liberating us from superstition and fear. He said:
“I believe myself to be (probably) permanently incapable of believing the
Christian scheme of vicarious salvation, and wedded to a more continuously
evolutionary mode of thought.” James considered philosophies “religious" if they
reflect and support a personal style of confronting life and enabling their possessors to act, hope, and dream instead of withdrawing in resignation and despair. SPGS
And he he defended humanism, holding a view pretty close to Clarence Darrow's. “'The religion of humanity' affords a basis for ethics as well as theism does," he writes in The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life. Let individuals take their consolations and their happiness wherever and however they find them, James says, but the philosopher as philosopher occupies a standpoint outside religion. SPGS

And the same can be said for the science teacher as science teacher. Religion is not science, though both spheres of life have their place. We all still have to keep learning, it seems, to stop stepping out of place. "Hands off," James liked to say. Let people be themselves. Let them believe what they will, but also let educators teach what we've learned about our shared life in the natural world.

Above all: live and let live.

See you in Zoomland, class.

No comments:

Post a Comment