WJ opposed "vicious intellectualism" but still identified with the tribe. Probably wouldn't have called himself "hard-line" (like Agnes Callard in Open Socrates), though.
"In 1899 William James wrote, in a letter referring to the role of the French intellectuals in the Dreyfus affair: “We ‘intellectuals’ in America must all work to keep our precious birthright of individualism, and freedom from these institutions [church, army, aristocracy, royalty]. Every great institution is perforce a means of corruption—whatever good it may also do. Only in the free personal relation is full ideality to be found.”1 It is significant in our own history that this early use of the term—the first in America of which I am aware—should have been made in the context of just such a “radical,” utopian, and anti-institutional statement of purpose. At least from the Progressive era onward, the political commitment of the majority of the intellectual leadership in the United States has been to causes that might be variously described as liberal (in the American use of that word), progressive, or radical."
"Anti-Intellectualism in American Life" by Richard Hofstadter (1963) https://a.co/iWl2QlE
No comments:
Post a Comment