Delight Springs

Wednesday, August 10, 2022

Eccentric Effective Altruists

 Most of the philosophers I know are more or less "normal," by conventional American mainstream standards... or so it seems to me. (But how would I know, right?)

Most of the philosophers who become prominent enough to crash the pages of The New Yorker, though, come across as exceptionally eccentric. To wit, "The Reluctant Prophet of Effective Altruism." William MacAskill became a Peter Singer disciple when as a Cambridge undergrad he read “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” and "was shunted onto a track of rigorous and uncompromising moralism."

The author of this profile observes MacAskill "doing his best to retain a grasp on spontaneity" but still coming off as rigidly self-programmed and doctrinaire. I've known philosophers like that, but they are indeed the exceptions. Unfortunately these high-profile pieces probably reassure most non-philosophers that philosophy's just not for them. 

To his credit, MacAskill still aspires to the Socratic ideal: to be an "independent pair of eyes on the world” and not the face and voice of a Movement that's yoked itself to a distortive ideology. Philosophy and celebrity don't usually mix. Isn't that why earnest Buddhists are supposed to kill the Buddha?


No comments:

Post a Comment